May 2026

Piercing the Corporate Veil: What is Required in Ontario? What are the requirements to “pierce the corporate veil” in Ontario? Specifically, what is the test and how have Ontario courts recently interpreted this equitable remedy? The Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Chanderpaul v. Caesars Convention Centre Ltd. speaks to these questions (“Chanderpaul”).[1] In Chanderpaul,...Read More

Wrongful Termination of a Franchise Agreement? What is the governing franchise agreement in the absence of a signed written contract between franchisor and franchisee? In this unclear context, what will courts consider in determining whether a wrongful termination of a franchisee has occurred? The Ontario Superior Court’s decision in Queen Mamma Ltd. et al v....Read More

When Shareholders Lie: Proving an Oppression Claim How should the Courts respond when a closely-held corporation comes before them with shareholders who lie, fabricate evidence, and attempt to mislead at every turn? That was the challenge facing Justice Stevenson in the recent decision of Kuang v. Young, 2026 ONSC 2091. Amid a matrimonial separation, Hugh...Read More

When a Director Is Personally Liable Without Piercing the Corporate Veil A corporation is recognized as a distinct legal entity from its directors and shareholders, which makes it liable in place of any individuals involved in wrongdoing. Doing so encourages people to partake in business partnerships and companies to minimize their legal risks. To prevent...Read More