Tanya Walker on CTV News: the Implications of Using Physical Force to Compel one to Attend Court

Title: Tanya Walker on CTV News: the Implications of Using Physical Force to Compel one to Attend Court
Date: April 18, 2025
Description: In this news report anchored by Tony Ryma, Tanya Walker was interviewed by Darren MacDonald of CTV News Northern Ontario to discuss the implications of using physical force to compel one to attend Court.

Transcript

0:00
foreign
0:02
[Music]
0:08
into the allegations of irregularities
0:11
in Ontario Premier Doug Ford’s more than
0:13
eight billion dollar land swap aimed at
0:15
building housing on the Greenbelt around
0:17
Toronto this investigation was announced
0:19
as we learned of this sudden resignation
0:21
of Ryan Amato who is the chief of staff
0:24
for Ontario’s housing Minister Amato was
0:26
the staffer responsible for choosing
0:28
which sites would be opened for
0:31
development for a closer look at this
0:32
investigation we’re joined by lawyer
0:34
Tanya Walker good morning to you nice to
0:36
see you
0:37
good morning to you thank you for having
0:38
me so the RCMP says it’s assessing
0:41
whether or not to investigate this land
0:43
swap after it was referred by the by
0:45
Ontario’s provincial police why is this
0:48
with the rcmpm what are they assessing
0:51
well why this is with your CMP is
0:54
because the Ontario Provincial Police
0:55
asked your CMP to take over the Ontario
0:59
Provincial Police said that they wanted
1:01
to avoid any perceived conflicts of
1:04
interest however particulars about the
1:06
perceived conflicts of interest were not
1:08
provided so I would expect our RCMP to
1:12
determine whether or not any criminal
1:13
charges would be laid as a result of the
1:16
report that was released by the auditor
1:18
general I want to expand on that a
1:20
little bit because what will the rcmb
1:21
investigation likely focus on
1:24
uh I would I would believe that the
1:26
investigation would focus on what could
1:29
lead to criminal charge such as bribery
1:31
so you would need evidence that
1:34
um any of the developers bribed any uh
1:37
government officials and um that might
1:40
be difficult to prove you need it in
1:42
writing
1:43
um to definitely say you can prove this
1:45
Beyond A Reasonable Doubt so you need
1:46
access to records emails
1:48
um any type of documentation to
1:50
substantiate this and maybe even
1:52
Financial records to see if there were
1:54
any deposits made in government
1:56
officials account bank account during
1:58
the time that these land developments
2:02
were rendered or given permission to to
2:06
develop will that be difficult to access
2:08
this this paper trail
2:10
I’m not too sure I would think that the
2:13
RCMP would be able to ask for this
2:15
documentation or get it themselves I’m
2:18
not sure if uh it would be easy to
2:21
determine whether or not uh Financial
2:23
deposit a large one would uh mean that
2:27
someone was right it’s a bit of an
2:29
uphill battle to demonstrate this and
2:32
prove this Beyond a reasonable doubt
2:33
that’s what that’s what I believe what
2:35
could this mean for Ontario Premier Doug
2:36
Ford
2:38
well it would have to be evidence that
2:40
Doug Ford uh knew or should have known
2:44
um that this happened
2:46
um and also in terms of bribery that
2:48
Doug Ford was also bribed I think that
2:51
would be difficult to demonstrate
2:53
um because if there’s a donation made to
2:55
his party it doesn’t necessarily mean
2:57
that there was bribery so I I believe
3:00
there will be a little bit of a
3:01
challenge to prove this this story is
3:03
just starting
3:04
sorry I forgot to mention that uh the
3:07
charges for bribing um an official it
3:10
could be uh 14 up to 14 years in jail
3:13
and an undetermined fine if someone is
3:16
convicted of doing this well we’ll watch
3:19
and see how this plays out Tanya Walker
3:20
thank you
3:21
thank you

Call Now Button